In a defiant response to recent military strikes by Israel and the United States, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian announced on Sunday that Iran will rebuild its damaged nuclear facilities “stronger than before,” reaffirming the nation’s commitment to its nuclear program despite international pressure and regional tensions.
Speaking during a visit to the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, President Pezeshkian declared, “By destroying buildings... we will not be set back.” He emphasized that Iranian scientists retain the expertise necessary to restore and advance the country’s nuclear capabilities, even in the face of significant infrastructure damage.
The strikes, which reportedly targeted key nuclear sites across Iran, were part of a coordinated campaign aimed at curbing Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. While U.S. President Donald Trump claimed the operation had “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear program, Iranian officials have disputed the extent of the damage, asserting that preparations were in place to mitigate disruptions.
Mohammad Eslami, head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, echoed the president’s sentiments, stating that restoration plans are already underway. “The plan is to prevent interruptions in the process of production and services,” Eslami said, adding that Iran had anticipated such attacks and taken steps to safeguard critical knowledge and personnel.
Amid escalating tensions, the Sultanate of Oman has stepped forward as a mediator, urging both Tehran and Washington to revive stalled diplomatic efforts. Omani officials have called for restraint and dialogue, warning that continued hostilities could destabilize the region further.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has expressed concern over the situation, with its chief welcoming the recent ceasefire but urging Iran to pursue a diplomatic solution. The agency continues to monitor developments closely, emphasizing the importance of transparency and cooperation in nuclear affairs.
Iran’s vow to rebuild its nuclear infrastructure comes at a critical juncture, as global powers weigh the implications of renewed nuclear activity and the potential for further conflict. The international community remains divided, with some advocating for renewed negotiations and others calling for increased sanctions and oversight.