The United States Department of Defense confirmed that military planners have developed contingency airstrike options for Nigeria. The decision follows a directive from President Donald J. Trump, who instructed the Pentagon to prepare for potential intervention in response to reported attacks on Christian communities in northern Nigeria.
According to officials familiar with the deliberations, the U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) presented multiple operational scenarios to the Department of Defense. These scenarios include “heavy,” “medium,” and “light” engagement options. The heavy option outlines deployment of a U.S. aircraft carrier strike group to the Gulf of Guinea, with fighter jets and long-range bombers positioned for strikes against militant strongholds. The medium option focuses on targeted drone operations using MQ-9 Reaper and MQ-1 Predator systems. The light option emphasizes intelligence support and limited aerial surveillance.
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth emphasized that the planning process remains precautionary. “The President directed us to prepare options that ensure protection of vulnerable populations and uphold U.S. commitments to global security. AFRICOM has responded with a range of proposals that allow flexibility depending on conditions on the ground,” Hegseth said.
Military officials stressed that no final decision has been made regarding execution of the plans. They noted that the Pentagon continues to monitor developments in Nigeria and consult with regional partners.
President Trump issued the directive after reports of escalating violence against Christian communities in Nigeria. In remarks aboard Air Force One earlier this week, the President stated, “They are killing Christians in very large numbers. We are not going to allow that to happen.” He added that all options remain under consideration, including airstrikes and possible ground operations.
The announcement has drawn significant attention from international observers. Analysts highlighted the potential geopolitical implications of U.S. military involvement in West Africa, particularly in relation to Nigeria’s sovereignty and regional stability.
Human rights organizations expressed concern about the humanitarian impact of potential airstrikes. Advocacy groups urged the administration to prioritize diplomatic engagement and humanitarian aid. Nigerian officials have not yet issued a formal response to the reports, though sources within Abuja indicated that government leaders are reviewing the situation closely.
The Department of Defense will continue to evaluate conditions in Nigeria and provide updates to the President. Officials confirmed that contingency planning remains ongoing and that any decision to proceed with military action will involve consultation with Congress and allied partners.